
By now we all know that Zohran Mamdani, the New York State freshman Assemblyman who lives in a one-bedroom apartment in Queens, is the current odds-on favorite to be elected Mayor of New York against disgraced ex-Governor Andrew Cuomo, who lives in a big house in Westchester. You may have seen his personable 30-second TikTok videos that have gone viral on social media or watched his impressive performance in the debate against the newly-Independent Cuomo and the equally checkered Curtis Sliwa, the GOP’s candidate.*

Mamdani was profiled at length in the October 19th New York Times Magazine by reporter Astead W. Herndon (gift link). Herndon describes Mamdani as a committed socialist who has evolved his positions to be “a tad less punitive:”
He has made it clear that he wants to support renters, not punish landlords. He wants to support public education, not take a hammer to specialized schools with elite admissions. He supports Palestinian rights; he’s not anti-Zionist. He made key concessions when it comes to policing. Importantly, he made clear that he was open to compromise when it came to his proposed millionaires’ tax. Call it Mamdani 2.0.
In that respect, Mamadani reminds me of Bill Clinton, except for the latter’s tawdriness. Like the Arkansan, Mamdani excels at retail politics and courts potential enemies across the spectrum. (Clinton’s advisors called this “triangulation.”) Similarly, Mamdani has been wooing business people, law enforcement, and real estate interests well beyond his base. Both men campaigned as affable down-home folks. And of course both have a good deal of charisma. On the campaign trail, both hammer on pocketbook issues, though Clinton’s promises were far more vague and he finessed many of them. Mamdani could yet do that, but selling out isn’t his nature in my opinion.
Clinton’s presidency was disappointing, his scandals not withstanding, partly because he had triangulated and had donors to please and so left progressive hanging. Of course so was Obama’s and to some extent Biden’s tenures. Democrats are good at watching which way the wind blows and acting cautiously. Republican politicians respond to winds even more easily, and are anything but cautious.
Mamdani seems to fit the bill in many respects and even if he doesn’t sell out his supporters’ ideals. I suspect we’re in for some disappointments if he’s elected. Not all will be his fault, as forces will build to make sure he doesn’t succeed, and some will stymie his efforts. It’s possible he can come to terms with the Police Department, which he has tried to do, starting with backpedaling on his call to defund the police during the George Floyd uprisings, continuing by schmoozing with some lower-ranked officers in what seemed like a focus group. And he’s engaged with clergy, visited synagogues and black churches along with mosques, and met with civic and landlord organizations.
Donald Trump greeted Mamdani’s surprise primary victory with “It’s shocking” (that a socialist could be mayor), going on to call him a communist, and threatening consequences:
“Let’s say this – if he does get in, I’m going to be president, and he’s going to have to do the right thing, or they’re not getting any money. He’s got to do the right thing or they’re not getting any money.”
And no doubt he will do so, legality be damned. This will be a test for Mamdani and his coalition and appointees. Will they bargain with Trump or defy him?
A telling moment came in the middle the Times’ profile, where he said he learned not to feel like an outsider. Something his father said seems to have helped him through that:
Mamdani said he remembers once telling his father, a professor of international affairs and anthropology at Columbia, that he was exhausted with “always feeling like a minority.” But his father’s reply changed his perspective. “I was an Indian in Uganda. I was a Muslim in India. And I was all of these things in New York City,” Mahmood Mamdani explained to his son. And “to be a minority is also to see the truth of the place amidst the promise of it.”
If Mamdani isn’t elected, he won’t be going away. At the least, he will still be a New York lawmaker. He could even primary AOC to replace Schumer, though that wouldn’t look good. I personally think he would be fighting above his weight and would face some headwinds from upstate. He would need to articulate a domestic agenda that appeals to homeowners and suburbanites and a foreign policy that involves more than Israel and Palestine.
It really is a generational thing, much more than than a minority thing, the has held the Democratic elite from endorsing him. (Bernie doesn’t count.) Mamdani represents a harsh truth that they seem unwilling to confront: the youth of this country despise them as much as they despise Trump. And while there are fairly young members of the DNC (one of whom was left out in the cold when he ran for Chair and another who left the committee), they still don’t get that they’re stuck in the past. There is always a reluctance among elected officials to pass the torch to anyone, much less young upstarts. I hope they learn before they lose again.
*Another young progressive with an unlikely name is Chicago’s Kat Abughazaleh, also adept at campaigning on social media. A Palestinian-American from a family with deep Republican roots, she’s a supporter of a free Palestine and a dogged opponent of ICE operations She’s energetically running for Congress in Illinois’ 9th district, where she hopes to unseat Jan Schakowsky, a four-term Democrat who Abughazalehv feels has gone soft despite caucusing with Progressives. See Kat being slammed to the ground by ICE agents, one of many short portrait videos on her You Tube channel. Like Mamdani, she’s earned death threats from the MAGA fringe. Here’s her campaign site.
|
You can find this and previous Perfidy Press Provocations in our newsletter archive. Should you see any you like, please consider forwarding this or links to others to people who might like to subscribe, and thanks. |



Yes and no. Whether ZM is “anti-Israel” is in the eye of the beholder. He says it’s cool with him for there to be an Israel, but not as a Jewish state. I agree with and apply the general comment above about his age, here. Everything he says and wants is a trendy Millennial idea, including his anti-Jewish-Israel position. Some of these ideas are fabulous, some ineffective (like the rent freeze, if it goes on for longer than a year, or the irrelevant grocery store idea), and some not clearly his biz. How, exactly, is Israel as a Jewish state different from the U.K., whose King is also the Head of the Church of England, to whom all citizens pay tax support? If you think England is not fully a Christian, Protestant place, despite its minorities, maybe you haven’t been there? Poland, all of South America, and lots of other places are 100% Catholic, regardless of minorities. Many countries are Muslim ethno-states.
Pulling back, why does ZM care so much about Israel, except for his tendency to care about trendy issues? I say this as someone who thinks Israel has murdered tens of thousands of people without any military justification. I’m not merely a pushover for the Israeli right. I’m skeptical of ZM’s reddit-produced ideas.
There is a NY Times article discussing his college influences. It should be clear to anyone reading this, except the professors in Bowdoin, that ZM received an incomplete education that amounts to lawyer’s evidence to support a pre-existing world view, rather than open exposure to a full range of ideas. Thus my other problem with him: he is a narrow-minded guy.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/28/us/politics/zohran-mamdani-bowdoin-college-new-york-mayor-election.html?unlocked_article_code=1.xE8.EjwV.TcnjPNxIx6i9&smid=url-share
Which is not to say: go vote for anyone else. Hell, no.
I think “trendy Millennial idea” is pretty pejorative and dismissive of ideals held by younger who “should know better,” according to their elders. “Israel First” is as stupid as “America First.” Nationalism, religiously-based or otherwise, doesn’t acknowledge that we live in an interconnected world where self-interest has lots of bad consequences for others and where weaponry and wealth do not constitute moral authority. AFAIC, Israel has a huge debt of karma to work out, as has the US ever since it decided to go into the imperialism business.